<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CultureWork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://culturework.uoregon.edu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://culturework.uoregon.edu</link>
	<description>A Periodic Broadside for Arts and Culture Workers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>January 2012. Vol. 16, No. 1.  –  Crowdsourcing and the Evolving Relationship between Artist and Audience: Daniel Linver   &#8211;   Transcending the Music Festival: A Look into an Adoption of Transmedia: Alyssa Fisher</title>
		<link>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2012/01/20/january-2012-vol-16-no-1-%e2%80%93-crowdsourcing-and-the-evolving-relationship-between-artist-and-audience-daniel-linver-transcending-the-music-festival-a-look-into-an-adoption-of-trans/</link>
		<comments>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2012/01/20/january-2012-vol-16-no-1-%e2%80%93-crowdsourcing-and-the-evolving-relationship-between-artist-and-audience-daniel-linver-transcending-the-music-festival-a-look-into-an-adoption-of-trans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CultureWork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previous Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaablogs.uoregon.edu/culturework/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Winter 2012 issues of CultureWork:  A Periodic Broadside for Arts and Culture Workers!</p> <p>Today&#8217;s cultural leaders seek to more readily engage audiences and funders through a variety of mediated forums, outlets, and devices, i.e., transmediated stories and platforms.  The articles in this issue of CultureWork bring forward the voices of two young <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2012/01/20/january-2012-vol-16-no-1-%e2%80%93-crowdsourcing-and-the-evolving-relationship-between-artist-and-audience-daniel-linver-transcending-the-music-festival-a-look-into-an-adoption-of-trans/">January 2012. Vol. 16, No. 1.  –  Crowdsourcing and the Evolving Relationship between Artist and Audience: Daniel Linver   &#8211;   Transcending the Music Festival: A Look into an Adoption of Transmedia: Alyssa Fisher</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Winter 2012 issues of <em>CultureWork:  A Periodic Broadside for Arts and Culture Workers!</em></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s cultural leaders seek to more readily engage audiences and funders through a variety of mediated forums, outlets, and devices,<br />
i.e., transmediated stories and platforms.  The articles in this issue of<em> CultureWork </em>bring forward the voices of two young professionals<br />
exploring specific applications of transmedia.  Alyssa Fisher examines transmedia trends in music festivals across the United States while<br />
Daniel Linver probes the role of crowdsourcing as a way to develop relationships between artists, audience members, and funders through<br />
online productions that reach and push out around the globe.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Julie Voelker-Morris<br />
Robert Voelker-Morris<br />
Editors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2012/01/20/january-2012-vol-16-no-1-%e2%80%93-crowdsourcing-and-the-evolving-relationship-between-artist-and-audience-daniel-linver-transcending-the-music-festival-a-look-into-an-adoption-of-trans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2011. Vol. 15, No. 4. – Creative Entanglement: The Challenges and Promises of Collaboration: Laurie Dean Torrell</title>
		<link>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/10/06/october-2011-vol-15-no-4-%e2%80%93-creative-entanglement-the-challenges-and-promises-of-collaboration-laurie-dean-torrell/</link>
		<comments>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/10/06/october-2011-vol-15-no-4-%e2%80%93-creative-entanglement-the-challenges-and-promises-of-collaboration-laurie-dean-torrell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CultureWork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previous Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Arts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaablogs.uoregon.edu/culturework/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Fall 2011 issue of CultureWork!</p> <p>Two and a half years ago, CultureWork published an article exploring the underpinnings of success for an administrative collaboration in Buffalo, NY.  Since that time, the collaboration has navigated a number of challenges in staffing, spacing, and administrative leadership.  In this issue of CultureWork, Laurie Dean Torrell, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/10/06/october-2011-vol-15-no-4-%e2%80%93-creative-entanglement-the-challenges-and-promises-of-collaboration-laurie-dean-torrell/">October 2011. Vol. 15, No. 4. – Creative Entanglement: The Challenges and Promises of Collaboration: Laurie Dean Torrell</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Fall 2011 issue of CultureWork!</p>
<p>Two and a half years ago, CultureWork published an article exploring the underpinnings of success for an administrative collaboration in Buffalo, NY.  Since that time, the collaboration has navigated a number of challenges in staffing, spacing, and administrative leadership.  In this issue of CultureWork, Laurie Dean Torrell, Executive Director of Just Buffalo Literary Center, updates how Just Buffalo, Big Orbit Gallery/Soundlab, and CEPA Gallery have addressed these concerns.  Through a theme of &#8220;Creative Entanglement,&#8221; Torrell offers recommendations for preparation and crisis management in  organizations encountering challenges in their own collaborative processes.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Julie Voelker-Morris<br />
Robert Voelker-Morris<br />
Editors</p>
<p><span id="more-250"></span></p>
<p class="text_bold" style="text-align: center"><strong><a id="top" name="top"></a></strong><strong>Creative Entanglement: The Challenges and Promises of Collaboration</strong></p>
<p class="text_bold" style="text-align: center"><a href="#author">Laurie Dean Torrell</a></p>
<p class="text_small">(Note: Below  article links open in a separate browser window or tab)<strong> </strong></p>
<p>The focus of this piece is to share the experience of Just Buffalo Literary Center, CEPA Gallery and Big Orbit Gallery/Soundlab, three cultural organizations in Buffalo, NY that have recently completed year six of an administrative collaboration, supported in large part by The John R. Oishei Foundation. You can read about the first phase of their experience in <em>“Concentric Concerns: The Art of Administrative Collaboration”</em> (CultureWork,  January 2009, <a href="http://culturework.uoregon.edu)." target="_blank">http://culturework.uoregon.edu</a>).</p>
<p>These organizations undertook an ambitious administrative collaboration as a way to keep their missions strong in the midst of widespread funding cuts.  The first three years of the collaboration went remarkably smooth<a href="#_edn1"></a> (<a href="#one">1</a>). The organizations exceeded their goals for board and staff development and revenue diversification while expanding local and national visibility.  A centralized downtown office and core structure of three shared staff was created, providing administrative support and access to top talent beyond what any individual organization would have been able to secure on its own.  Individual contributions increased by 300%, corporate funding by 200%, and membership by 22%.</p>
<p>The second three years brought a series of sobering challenges.  Having now successfully come through these experiences, it is possible to say that our collaboration proved resilient and strong.  The focus of this second of two articles is to share the experience of navigating these challenges in the hope that it will be useful to cultural colleagues interested in exploring and implementing administrative collaborations.  What follows is a discussion and description of each challenge faced, followed by the “lessons learned”/recommendations for other organizations in similar circumstances.</p>
<p><em><strong>Challenge #1: Shared Space</strong></em></p>
<p>Early in 2008, we became aware that a rent increase might be in the works for the city-owned, rented space that houses CEPA’s galleries and the three organizations’ shared administrative office.  All of the organizations were feeling cramped due to the success of their programs. Not wanting to be without options, the organizations began exploring alternative spaces.  Attention quickly became focused on Artspace Buffalo <a href="#_edn2"></a> (<a href="#two">2</a>) which had just completed a number of artist apartments and was looking for a commercial tenant for a large central space.  This began a nine month odyssey of talking with our boards, looking at this and other locations, meeting with the developer and architects, drawing up plans and a case for support, and preparing to do a capital campaign feasibility study.</p>
<p>Once into this process, the organizations found they had different needs and visions in terms of space.  Securing a permanent home suitable for each organization’s programming was a separate decision than simply sharing administrative office space.  The boards came to the table with very different perspectives, needs, and risk tolerances. The three executive directors continued working through issues and were about to launch a capital campaign feasibility study when the financial crisis throughout the United States hit in November 2008, and the decision was made to abandon the effort.   The information that had been gathered was used to negotiate an extended lease with minimal increase at the current location, and it was a relief to step back and regroup.</p>
<p><strong>Lessons Learned </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>As a collaboration progresses, actively seek ways to forge connections and build trust (including awareness of and respect for differences) at the full board level.  In our case, a collaboration committee consisting of the executive directors and three board members from each organization met quarterly.  Organizational staff had worked closely together for several years and built up a significant reserve of trust and resilience.  But when faced with a major high stakes decision, it became clear that this did not extend to the full boards which added a great deal of difficulty to the process.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Consider carefully each individual organization’s real space needs (flowing from the mission and organizational culture) before assessing whether they can be successfully meshed. This is particularly important to think through in collaborations involving different types of organizations, or organizations working in different disciplines.  It is almost always possible to create a shared business/administrative office, but program and performance space needs may require customized solutions.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If shared space is anywhere on the organization’s horizon, establish a shared space task force with representatives from each organization to start working on the process, and involving key stakeholders, well in advance.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><em>Challenge #2: A space in which to manifest the mission</em></strong></p>
<p>After this, Just Buffalo planned to ‘sit tight’ with the space issue.  However, early in 2009, Western New York Book Arts Collaborative approached Just Buffalo about sharing space in its newly renovated building in downtown Buffalo, the Western New York Book Arts Center (WNYBAC).  Upon meeting at WNYBAC, Just Buffalo realized that this might be the answer to the growing dilemma of needing more room for programs which had become  too numerous to be held at multiple off-site locations.  Soon after, Just Buffalo made the decision to move its programmatic offices to, and develop a regular performance space in, WNYBAC&#8217;s second floor (taking occupancy in July, 2009).   This expansion to WNYBAC opened the door to a new mission-based strategic partnership between Just Buffalo and the WNYBAC, a non-profit 501c3 cultural organization and working print museum.</p>
<p>Having placed great emphasis on the benefits of proximity, the collaborative administration group now faced questions including:</p>
<ul>
<li>What did it mean to have one of the collaborators moving part of their offices to another location?</li>
<li>What impact would it have on the collaboration to have one executive director (and two of the other Just Buffalo directors) housed at another site?</li>
<li>Did this somehow signal a decreased commitment to the collaboration?</li>
</ul>
<p>Several things helped in navigating this challenge.  The decision was made to maintain the shared administrative office at Market Arcade and keep that the administrative hub.  Just Buffalo moved its Executive Director, Artistic Director, and Education Director to the new site and implemented cell phones with direct numbers. Regular meetings, constant email, and frequent trips back and forth between sites were continued.  As everyone adjusted to the new configuration, it became clearer that this was yet another manifestation of organizational flexibility and creative co-location rather than an abandonment.</p>
<p><strong>Lessons Learned </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Think flexibly about space and put all options on the table in order to create an optimum configuration.  Early in our collaboration, it made sense for Just Buffalo to give up most of its space and move in with our collaborators.  This kept operating expenses to a minimum during a 2005 funding crisis, and the proximity helped establish and cement the collaboration.  Later, with increased growth, more dedicated programming space was needed and found through a new strategic partnership.  What works at one stage of an organization’s life cycle may not work at another.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Utilize digital technology.  Portable laptops, cell phones, and especially email and Skype have made it possible to think more creatively about location as well as about how work gets done and from where.  We now have one organization spread over two sites, a shared business office for the three organizations, and a shared grant writer who is based in a different city.  We were also recently able to arrange for a valued staff director to work from overseas for several months while with her husband on a Fulbright Award.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><em>Challenge #3: Building Fundraising Capacity </em></strong></p>
<p>After successfully making progress on fundraising goals, the next capacity-building step was seen as hiring a shared development manager to the staff.  To that end, a Development Associate was brought on. This first hire came through one of the organizations, someone who had a strong affinity and fit with this specific organization, but ultimately, not the others in the collaboration.  It took nearly a year to work through the fact that a change in staffing was needed.  This setback required the directors to step back, re-evaluate their goals, and determine exactly what they needed to support their fundraising efforts. They worked extensively to assess each group’s needs, develop a new clarified job description, and hired an experienced and skilled Development Director in October 2009. The organizations received 18 months of benefit from this position before a new round of funding cuts hit, and it became impossible to continue the position to full sustainability. The executive directors and boards were now, however, much more capable of implementing the comprehensive development plans which had been put in place by the development director and optimistic about maintaining forward momentum.</p>
<p><strong>Lessons Learned</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Conduct a full hiring process, even (or perhaps especially) if the job candidate has already worked with one of the organizations.  All members of the collaboration must be totally on board with a new hire for it to work.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Remain optimistic and committed to making the best hire you possibly can, getting all skills and experience needed to fill a position, until or unless it is proven impossible.  Pooling resources, offering a unique collaborative opportunity, and providing flexibility, reasonable compensation for top talent, and paid time off can be great recruiting tools.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Commit to providing timely feedback to both the staff member and your collaborators. Conduct regular evaluations of shared staff to allow plenty of time to talk through differences of opinion about needs and performance.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Understand going into the process that it will likely take three or more years to bring a staff development position to full sustainability (generating enough revenue to cover all the expenses of the position as well as meet the organizational goals for the position) and plan accordingly.  If this is not feasible, make maximum use of a skilled consultant who can work with your organization over an extended period of time.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><em>Challenge #4: Unexpected Leadership Transition</em></strong></p>
<p>In late fall 2009, CEPA Gallery was thrust into unexpected leadership transition when its executive director became embroiled in a legal issue.  He was extremely well liked and was the highly visible face of the organization, having led it over 11 years to national prominence.  He was also strongly identified with the administrative collaboration and was considered the one most responsible for starting it and most often speaking on its behalf.</p>
<p>Within a short time, as press coverage heated up, and his attention needed to be focused on defending the case, it became clear that the director would need to step down.  The three organizations’ destinies were now intertwined, so the questions extended beyond the immediate “what is going to happen with CEPA?” to include many others including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Would funding or programs be pulled?</li>
<li>Would staff be lost, including a new development director just hired?</li>
<li>Would shared staff positions be in jeopardy if grant funding or donor support fell?</li>
<li>Would the reputation of one or all of the organizations be damaged?</li>
<li>Could the collaboration survive this crisis?</li>
</ul>
<p>Just Buffalo’s board executive committee held weekly calls to support the staff and work through contingency planning. There was particular concern, because of the nature of the charges, of a negative impact on our joint education programs.  The education directors spoke with their key contacts and found that no negative affects materialized.  After a turbulent several months of board deliberations behind closed doors, CEPA’s Artistic Director, Sean Donaher, stepped in and was named Interim Executive Director.  Nine months after the crisis broke, he was named permanent Executive Director by the CEPA board, helping to close that difficult chapter.</p>
<p><strong>Lessons Learned</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Think through the kind of crises your organization might face: scandal, fraud, death, or illness of a leader or a program participant, extreme weather disruption, theft, or fire.  This step alone led us to establish, for example, a more comprehensive off-site computer backup protocol and a master list of all passwords for every computer and program in the agency.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>An unexpected leadership succession can happen in any organization.  Take the time now to do an emergency succession plan. A great example which we used to focus our thinking can be found at <a href="http://www.thealliancenys.org/nysarts/Arts%20Forward%20Archive/Emergency_Succession_Plan_Template.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.thealliancenys.org/nysarts/Arts%20Forward%20Archive/Emergency_Succession_Plan_Template.pdf</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Develop a crisis response protocol following the basic principles of crisis communication which forces you to answer questions such as these:
<ul>
<li>Who will act as spokesperson (one voice) in the event of a crisis?</li>
<li>Who will be part of the ‘crisis response team’, called together in the event of a crisis to chart a unified response?</li>
<li>How will you ensure that the organization’s first priority and key focus remains those served?  That essential work continues being done with minimal interruption?</li>
<li>How will communication be conducted with key stakeholders including the organization’s own staff? (For example, do responses to this question include eliminating the use of email for discussing anything that could be damaging to anyone involved?).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Bring these topics to the table for discussion with your board and collaborators, with the understanding that you hope they’ll never be needed, but that the organization will be better off for having at least discussed in advance.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><strong>Conclusion</strong></em></p>
<p>When organizations enter into an administrative collaboration or strategic partnership, they join destinies in a significant way.   This is not without its risks and is one of the many reasons why such endeavors must be rooted in mutual trust and be provided with the appropriate foundation, structure, and support to give them every chance of success.  While you can never anticipate all the twists and turns in the road, it is our hope that by sharing this experience of challenges over the past three years, we can reinforce the value of collaboration as a force of stability through challenging times, and provide others starting down this road themselves with all the advantages of those who have gone before.</p>
<p>[<a href="#top">Back to Top</a>]</p>
<hr />
<p><span class="text"><a id="one" name="one"></a>1. </span>Now having completed its sixth year, this effort, “The Art of  Collaboration,” has been honored with a National Certificate of  Recognition from the Kellogg and Lodestar Foundations; profiled in two  national publications (see <em>Board Member Magazine </em>(2009, July/August) and <em>CultureWork: A Periodic Broadside for Arts and Culture Workers (2009, January,</em> <a href="http://culturework.uoregon.edu" target="_blank">http://culturework.uoregon.edu</a>);  and sought out by organizations throughout New York State and across  the country for advice and technical assistance.   For more information  about each individual organization, go to their websites: Just Buffalo  Literary Center <a href="http://www.justbuffalo.org" target="_blank">http://www.justbuffalo.org</a>; CEPA Gallery <a href="http://www.cepagallery.org" target="_blank">http://www.cepagallery.org</a>; and Big Orbit Gallery <a href="http://www.bigorbitgallery.org" target="_blank">http://www.bigorbitgallery.org</a>.<span class="text"> </span><span class="text_small">[<a href="#top">back to text</a>] </span></p>
<p><a id="two" name="two"></a>2. <a href="http://artspacebuffalo.info/info.html"> http://artspacebuffalo.info/info.html</a></p>
<hr />
<p><a id="author" name="author"></a><span class="text"><strong>Laurie Dean Torrell</strong> is the Executive Director of Just Buffalo Literary Center, Buffalo, New York. Torrell has 25 years experience in non-profit organizations spanning health care, human services, and the arts.   Since becoming director nine years ago, Torrell has worked with staff and board to implement a new mission statement, strategic plan, focused operational direction, and two strategic collaborations – one focused on administrative/back office support and one focused on shared space. Under her leadership, the organization has secured competitive national, state, and local grants to double the budget and bring expanded literary programming to the local community including the Babel Literary Lecture series featuring readings and conversations with the world’s foremost international authors, and Writing With Light, a joint education program developed with CEPA Gallery.  She can be contacted at <a href="mailto:Ldean@justbuffalo.org">Ldean@justbuffalo.org</a>.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="text">[<a href="#top">Back to Top</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/10/06/october-2011-vol-15-no-4-%e2%80%93-creative-entanglement-the-challenges-and-promises-of-collaboration-laurie-dean-torrell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2011. Vol. 15, No. 3. – ChinaVine.org: Student Engagement in the Interpretive and Planning Process</title>
		<link>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/07/01/june-2010-vol-15-no-3-%e2%80%93-chinavine-org-student-engagement-in-the-interpretive-and-planning-process/</link>
		<comments>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/07/01/june-2010-vol-15-no-3-%e2%80%93-chinavine-org-student-engagement-in-the-interpretive-and-planning-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CultureWork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previous Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross Cultural Exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folklore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaablogs.uoregon.edu/culturework/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>ChinaVine is a collaborative project between faculty, independent scholars, and students at the University of Oregon, University of Central  Florida, Shandong University of Art and Design, Beijing Normal University, and the Beijing Folk Literature and Art Association.  The ChinaVine.org site is an interpretive online space allowing for contributors from around the world to present ideas, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/07/01/june-2010-vol-15-no-3-%e2%80%93-chinavine-org-student-engagement-in-the-interpretive-and-planning-process/">June 2011. Vol. 15, No. 3. – ChinaVine.org: Student Engagement in the Interpretive and Planning Process</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChinaVine is a collaborative project between faculty, independent scholars, and students at the University of Oregon, University of Central  Florida, Shandong University of Art and Design, Beijing Normal University, and the Beijing Folk Literature and Art Association.  The ChinaVine.org site is an interpretive online space allowing for contributors from around the world to present ideas, images, and interpretations of Chinese folk art and participatory culture.   The site is now preparing for a relaunch in Fall 2011.  In this article, faculty and former graduate students at the University of Oregon, coordinators of the site&#8217;s development, introduce the visioning behind the process and the ways in which challenges have been met for transferring a diverse and vibrant folk culture to an online medium.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Julie Voelker-Morris<br />
Robert Voelker-Morris<br />
Editors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/07/01/june-2010-vol-15-no-3-%e2%80%93-chinavine-org-student-engagement-in-the-interpretive-and-planning-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2011. Vol. 15, No. 2.  – Community Arts Behind the Walls: Grady Hillman</title>
		<link>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/04/20/april-2011-vol-15-no-2-%e2%80%93-community-arts-behind-the-walls/</link>
		<comments>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/04/20/april-2011-vol-15-no-2-%e2%80%93-community-arts-behind-the-walls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CultureWork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previous Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts & Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restorative Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaablogs.uoregon.edu/culturework/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the current issue of CultureWork, Grady Hillman chronicles his experience visiting the Oregon State Correctional Institute (OSCI) with a cohort of university faculty, graduate students, and community arts leadership.  Their goal was to meet with the OSCI Crochet Club, a prison group that crochets blankets, caps, and other fabric items for needy organizations outside <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/04/20/april-2011-vol-15-no-2-%e2%80%93-community-arts-behind-the-walls/">April 2011. Vol. 15, No. 2.  – Community Arts Behind the Walls: Grady Hillman</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the current issue of <em>CultureWork</em>, Grady Hillman chronicles his experience visiting the Oregon State Correctional Institute (OSCI) with a cohort of university faculty, graduate students, and community arts leadership.  Their goal was to meet with the OSCI Crochet Club, a prison group that crochets blankets, caps, and other fabric items for needy organizations outside the prison.  Hillman explores the surprises, contradictions, and self-reflections that arose from the experience.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Julie Voelker-Morris<br />
Robert Voelker-Morris<br />
Editors</p>
<p><span id="more-157"></span></p>
<h3 style="text-align: center"><strong><a id="top" name="top"></a></strong>Community Arts Behind the Walls</h3>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong><a href="#author">Grady Hillman</a></strong></p>
<p>(Note: Below  article links open in a separate browser window or tab)<strong> </strong></p>
<p class="text">In January, I visited the University of Oregon (UO) as a guest of the Center for Community Arts and Cultural Policy (CCACP) (<a href="http://ccacp.uoregon.edu/" target="_blank">http://ccacp.uoregon.edu</a>) in a three day stint organized by my good friend, Lori Hager.  Lori, Assistant Professor within the Community Arts Concentration of the Arts &amp; Administration Program at the UO, and I have known one another for several years and worked together through the Community Arts Convening and Research Project (<a href="http://www.mica.edu/news/community_arts_convening_and_research_project.html" target="_blank">http://www.mica.edu/news/community_arts_convening_and_research_project.html</a>).   I received an M.A. in Linguistic Anthropology with specialization in Folklore a long time ago, and I’ve always cited Lori as another rare example of anthropologist turned community arts activist (or <em>animateur</em> (<a href="#one">1</a>) <a id="backone2" name="backone"></a>, a term I learned which describes me according to the flyer announcing my visit).  It always appeared to me that the contemporary community arts field has derived its major strands of articulation from arts education (curriculum-based), sociology and social work (therapeutic and social change methodologies), and the old guild model (master artist/apprentice structures) while I felt like anthropology had a lot to offer.</p>
<p class="text">Many community arts programs are grounded in our commonality, the kindred nature of human experience and the egalitarian desire to share the artistic tools of expression to those of us who are marginalized. (<a href="#two">2</a>) <a id="backtwo" name="backtwo"></a> That is a noble and functional construct.  The anthropological approach—at least my version of it—accepts this but goes beyond to recognize the “otherness” of those whom we work with in alternative settings, and that they have as much to teach us as we do them.  The University of Oregon CCACP programs exemplify this approach.  Prior to visiting Eugene for my lectures and workshops, I had the serendipitous opportunity to have dinner with Lori; John Fenn, Assistant Professor in the Media Arts concentration of Arts &amp; Administration at the UO; and Doug Blandy, Department Head of Arts and Administration and Associate Dean for the School of Architecture and Allied Arts.  Over wine and Thai food, we enjoyed a lively inter-disciplinary dialogue about community arts. I remember most clearly Doug’s summoning of the spirit of Paolo Freire whose educational outreach philosophy asserted that educators learn more from their students than the students learn from the educators. Doug founded the Institute for Community Arts Studies which became CCCAP, and he’d extended this educational mantra to students and faculty working in community settings.  I also found it unique that the Institute for Community Arts Studies was the historical umbrella not only for the Center for Community Arts and Policy but also the Oregon Folklife Network.</p>
<p class="text">Lori’s invitation for me to visit Oregon was not based on our friendship or collegial regard, but because I have spent some 30 years developing arts-in-corrections programs in the United States and abroad.  Over the past few months, there had been a convergence of Oregon academic and community interest in this field, and she wanted me there to help explore, discuss, and share information, but also, to serve as a catalyst for meaningful dialogues and cooperation.  The strands of collaboration were led by Kelley Totten, Assistant Director of the UO’s Center for Intercultural Dialogues (which had just initiated a three year Peace and Prisons Initiative; see <a href="http://unesco.uoregon.edu/" target="_blank">http://unesco.uoregon.edu/</a>);  Melissa Crabbe, Assistant National Director of the Inside-Out Prison Exchange Program (see <a href="http://www.insideoutcenter.org/home.html" target="_blank">http://www.insideoutcenter.org/home.html</a>); Steven Shankman who wears many hats as Director of the Center for Intercultural Dialogue, the UNESCO Chair for Transcultural Studies, Interreligious Dialogue, and Peace, and member of the Steering Committee of the national Inside-Out Prison Exchange Program; and, Lisa Gilman, Program Director of Folklore Studies from UO with sponsorship from the Oregon Folklife Network. My stint in Oregon fulfilled this anthropologist/community arts activist’s dream of a personally ideal organizational array.</p>
<p class="text">Another sponsor of my visit was Tim Hicks, Director of the Master&#8217;s Degree Program in Conflict and Dispute Resolution at UO.  Lori had touted me as an expert in arts and restorative justice and Kelley thought Tim’s program might want to sign on as a co-sponsor of my visit.  The invitation evoked an e-mail dialogue.  Tim’s initial contention when asked to be a sponsor of my visit was that the link to conflict resolution was thin, that our definition of “restorative justice” was different from that of his program’s which applies to a process “in which an offender takes responsibility and everyone involved is helped to be able to move forward from an injury in as constructive and healing manner as possible.”  He acknowledged the healing quality of the arts.  I agreed with Tim that there were two different definitions of “restorative justice.”  One he applied based on a process of Victim Offender Mediation. Mine was grounded in the use of cultural and traditional practices to mediate between offenders and the communities they’d injured with the intent of restoring offenders to their communities as members in full standing after “giving back” through the creation of art which demonstrated an understanding of the values of that community.</p>
<p class="text">Since our initial correspondence, Tim and I have discovered convergences of our practice models in our parallel work in Northern Ireland, and we’ve continued to correspond about his on-going work with water management disputes in Kenya and my interest in the arts-in-restorative justice practices in New Zealand and Australia informed by traditional Maori and Aboriginal culture.</p>
<p class="text">My visit was packed with similar potent dialogues that I’d like to say emanated from my lectures; however, the seminal event that set the stage was a visit to the Oregon State Correctional Institute (OSCI), a medium security prison for men in Salem.  Melissa and Kelley had set up a visit with the OSCI Crochet Club, a prison group that crochets blankets, caps, and other fabric items for needy organizations on the outside.  Nineteen of us&#8211;faculty members, students, and leadership from the sponsors—were to meet with an unknown number of inmates.  As it turned out, almost all the inmate artists from the prison crafts shop had turned out, prepared an elaborate display of material and visual art, and were ready to meet me, the prison art expert. They were as surprised by our numbers and composition as we were by the sophistication and variety of their work, and that 31 of them were joining us.</p>
<p class="text">Melissa, an expert at college/prison collaboratives, organized a “wagon wheel” ice breaker that I can only describe as something like a hybrid of circular speed-dating with square-dancing <em>call out</em> questions, mostly about personal experiences with the arts. It worked well to subdue nervousness on both sides. I then organized the group into a large circle with everyone individually introducing himself or herself along with a brief statement about why they’d come or a question they’d come to have answered.  While Melissa and I recorded the various themes of their responses, it became apparent to me that there was a significant dynamic presenting itself. We had the townspeople, the prisoners, who were in need of cultural planning assistance, and we had the visitors from outside who had training, if not always a lot of experience, in community arts planning.  The townspeople seemed to have interests that followed three somewhat distinct themes: expansion of arts programming in the OSCI and other prisons, using the arts as a vehicle for “giving back,” and professional arts development by being more engaged with the professional arts world outside.</p>
<p class="text">Apart from my work with arts-in-corrections, I also have been developing cultural plans for towns and cities based on their historic, cultural, and artistic assets.  I had never done it before in a correctional setting, but that’s what wanted to happen at the OSCI—a town meeting planning session.  To summarize the process, we held three break-out sessions of self-selected townies and outsiders around the three big issues.  Guided questions asked the break-out sessions to go beyond wants to strategies for successful outcomes, an action plan.  There were recorders and facilitators in each group and a report out to the larger group.  Groups found the process to be extraordinarily successful, all learning from one another, and all empowered by the utilization of individual knowledge and experience to a common purpose.</p>
<p class="text">There was no time for me to return to the OSCI after we left to debrief with the folks who live there. However, it was apparent that something truly significant had happened for the students and faculty who made the journey. Prior to my visit, Lori’s graduate students had read some of my articles and posited a series of questions for me about arts-in-corrections programs. On our way to Salem from Eugene to visit the OSCI, I made the ride in one of the vans with a group of students and faculty and was able to discuss some of the policy and cultural issues about prison work.  However, on the way back after the visit with the same students, there was a strange quiet with intermittent attempts at discussion but nothing that satisfied.  They were struggling to find language that adequately described the fresh experience; it was personal now and not theoretical.</p>
<p class="text">The next morning, a Roundtable Discussion was scheduled for me with the same students.  This was also attended by faculty and students who had not made the trip.  We even had an entire University fabric arts class present to hear about the OSCI Crochet Club.  It immediately became apparent that the students who made the trip were ready to talk about it, needed to talk about it. They had crossed the liminality between cultures, found counterparts on the other side who lived in a very different world, had found a common language in art-making, and come back changed by the experience.  One topic that immediately came up was their visceral response to meeting the men at OSCI.  They had traversed a labyrinth of security to get into the prison, only to enter a vast illuminated corridor with lines of convicts walking along the walls.  The Corrections Officer who was leading our group firmly ordered that we get in single file in the middle of the hallway but stay at least 5 feet from the prisoners and not to make eye contact.  Thirty seconds later, we turned into the Education room which was packed with thirty plus prisoners, milling around in close quarters and we were making room for ourselves within their group.  Several students remarked that they felt panic and had to overcome a flight response. They were bewildered by the contradictory conventions of the space and thrown off by the abrupt riptide of constructed identities—on this side of the door dangerous convicts, on that side fellow artists.  What were the roles?  In the turbulence of that reality mix, they discovered much about themselves, about the people they met, about the criminal justice system, and about the power of art to bring coherency to lives in conflict.  Freire’s mandate was satisfied.</p>
<p class="text">Many of the same students and faculty who visited OSCI are still at work with Kelley Totten and Lisa Gilman who are working in collaboration with the Oregon Folklife Network to create an exhibit of the artwork from OSCI to open at the <em>Cascadia Symposium on Prisons, Peace, and Compassion</em> (<a href="#three">3</a>) <a id="backthree" name="backthree"></a> near Seattle May 20-22.  I am gratified that our exercise in cultural planning behind the walls is bearing fruit.</p>
<p>[<a href="#top">Back to Top</a>]</p>
<hr />
<p><a id="one" name="one"></a>1.For more about animating in community arts see Smith, Mark K. (2009). Animateurs, animation and fostering learning and change. <em>The encylopaedia of informal education</em>. Original published 1999. Retrieved from <a href="http://www.infed.org/animate/b-animat.htm" target="_blank">http://www.infed.org/animate/b-animat.htm</a>. <span class="text_small">[<a href="#backone">back to text</a>] </span></p>
<p class="text"><a id="two" name="two"></a>2.     As Lori Hager and Arlene Goldbard have well-documented, the community arts field has deep roots in the settlement houses of the late 1800s which served new immigrant populations, the Works Progress Administration with its arts outreach during the Great Depression (much of it in the arena of folklore), and the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of the 1970s which recruited artists to work in homeless shelters, hospitals, senior centers, and prisons among other non-traditional venues.  <span class="text_small">[<a href="#backtwo">back to text</a>]</span></p>
<p class="text"><a id="three" name="three"></a>3.  Learn more about the upcoming conference at <a href="http://unesco.uoregon.edu/programs/ppc_may2011.html" target="_blank">http://unesco.uoregon.edu/programs/ppc_may2011.html</a> <span class="text_small">[<a href="#backthree">back to text</a>]</span></p>
<hr />
<p><a id="author" name="author"></a><span class="text">Hillman is Director of the Center for Community Arts at Texas State University-San Marcos and has worked extensively as a resident artist, program administrator, and arts consultant for local, state, federal, and foreign agencies in the development of arts programs for community settings.   From 1999 to 2002, he was Technical Assistance Provider to a federal initiative Arts Programs for Young Offenders in Detention and Corrections, a Discretionary Grant program of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). From 2002-2004, Hillman served as a consultant to another federal initiative partnering the National Guild for Community Schools for the Arts, the Arts Endowment and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Creative Communities. Hillman has published extensively in the area of community arts and humanities programs including two monographs for Americans for the Arts: Artists in The Community:  Training Artists to Work in Alternative Settings (1996) and The Arts and Humanities as Agents for Social Change:  Summary Report of the 4th International Congress of Educating Cities (1998).  In 2002, he published Arts Programs for Juvenile Offenders in Detention and Corrections: A Guide to Promising Practices for OJJDP and the NEA.<br />
</span></p>
<p class="text">[<a href="#top">Back to Top</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://culturework.uoregon.edu/2011/04/20/april-2011-vol-15-no-2-%e2%80%93-community-arts-behind-the-walls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

